USG - Utrecht School of Governance
Centre de recherche public Accréditation CIR
Contact |
||
|
Téléphone : 31 (0)3025 38101
Mail : info.usg [ at ] uu.nl
Adresse :
Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University
Bijlhouwerstraat 6
3511 ZC Utrecht
Pays-Bas
|
||
|
Etablissements de rattachement |
||
|
Consultez cette fiche en intégralité ? |
||
|
Consultez cette fiche et près de 50 000 autres fiches de Centres de Recherche dans plus de 30 pays européens sur Expernova.com !
Inscrivez-vous ou contactez-nous pour une démonstration personnalisée.
Il s’agit de votre centre de Recherche ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et complétez vos informations. |
||
|
Description
(Extrait du site web) |
||
|
The Utrecht University School of Governance (USG) studies public organizations and their interaction with the social and administrative environment. This may concern public organizations such as government institutions, but also private organizations with public duties such as hospitals, housing corporations and service companies. Our main focus is how these organizations deal with current social issues and give shape to their public responsibility.
Our research focuses on interactions between social transformations and organisations in public domains. More specifically: interactions between social transformations and organizations with public functions, and how these organizations make sense of and react to the consequences of these transformations from a public (governance) perspective. This focus on publicness runs throughout the various core activities of the USG, whether these are teaching, research, or consultancy. Our research programme aims to investigate interactions between society, organizations, and governance by highlighting three core aspects. They represent three corners of a triangle – the so-called USG-triangle (see below). The title ‘Public Matters’ aptly conveys the different meanings in which publicness is investigated. Firstly, the program focuses on social issues and related public concerns that result from various important social transformations, such as: - Internationalization of economy, governance, and society. The rise of multi-level forms of governance, both at the European and at a global level, raises a series of concerns about democracy and accountability. Similarly, the international trend towards public management reforms in public organizations and commercialization in voluntary organizations raises concerns for public service motivation and service quality. - (Im)migration, cultural and social diversification understood broadly as involving diversities related to gender, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, professional identities and lifestyles. More specifically, issues regarding organizing diversities that arise for societies and organizations, and the related meanings of (public) responsibilities that public, private, and voluntary organizations recognize and enact. - Informatization and more specifically the emerging primacy of an information society. Specific interest concerns the consequences of this transformation for political participation and democracy, the autonomy and responsibility of professionals, and the human resource policies that support professionalization, employability and labour participation. Secondly, our research is confined to organizations with public functions. These are organizations which may be loosely defined as belonging to the public sector, such as government departments, agencies and independent administrative bodies, private institutions with public tasks, interest groups, associations and other civil society organizations and service organizations (profit and non-profit) like health care organizations and schools. We study how such organizations work. Thirdly, our program attaches particular importance to (taking) public responsibility and public accountability. We think publicness matters. This yields a focus on questions such as: what does the interaction between social transformations and organizations with a public function imply about issues of ‘good governance’, both in the sense of public and corporate governance? How does it affect issues of political citizenship, democratic control, and public accountability, and such broader themes as socially responsible enterprise and social citizenship? Our research programme combines approaches from public administration, political and social science, management and organization science. We value theoretical and methodological pluriformity and our research focus benefits from the insights that various disciplines, theoretical perspectives, and methodologies can offer. Our research programme is divided into three major research lines, flowing from the aforementioned meanings of publicness: 1. Managing social issues 2. Public management 3. Public governance |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Profil scientifique partiel |
||
|
|
||
|
Domaines étudiés partiels
|
||
|
|
||
|
Domaines scientifiques
|
||
|
||
|
Quelques documents de Utrecht School of Governance
|
||
|
Deciphering the Dutch drop: ten explanations for decreasing political trust in The Netherlands
Auteurs :
M.A.P. Bovens et A.C. Wille
Masquer le résumé
The Netherlands has always been the odd case out regarding trust in public institutions.
In the 1980s and 1990s, contrary to international trends, trust in government
remained high and even increased. Suddenly, from 2002 onwards, public
trust in government declined dramatically. In this article we examine the plausibility
of ten explanations, embedded in the international scholarly literature, and
explore whether they are empirically supported or rebutted in case of the Dutch
drop. We find that because most of the literature concentrates on the crossnational
erosion of political support over a long period within Western democracies,
explanations tend to focus on gradual, long-term demographic, social, and
political trends. Sudden dips in trust levels, however, require different sets of
explanatory factors; they are better explained by political or economic contingencies,
such as sudden political or economic crises. In the case of the Dutch drop, the
most plausible explanation is a combination of an economic decline, combined
with high political instability and contestation during the first Balkenende cabinets.
As of 2007, with a new cabinet in office, and an economic recovery in place, trust
figures are on the rise again.
The design of public agencies: overcoming agency costs and commitment problems.
Reform Styles of Political and Administrative Elites in Majoritarian and Consensus Democracies: Public Management Reforms in New Zealand and The Netherlands
Reluctant Customers: Presidents and Policy Advise
New Questions in Organizing diversity in Dutch amateur Sport
Purple and post-purple
Learning by doing, mutual understanding
|
||

Universiteit Utrecht